Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
REQUEST
For the period 1 January 2000 to the most recent date available, please provide:
Clarification
I mean 2020. Thank you.
RESPONSE
Occurrence Data:
A search has been completed using our crime and incident recording system (Niche RMS) for all offences recorded between 1st January 2020 and 24th September 2026 using the Home Office Offence Code: 42/42/1/TH68004: Theft of mail bag or postal packet (S.1 (pt) Theft Act 1968).
Arrest Data:
A custody search has been completed using our crime and incident recording system (Niche RMS) for all arrests recorded between 1st January 2020 and 24th September 2026 using the Arrest Reason Description: Theft of mail bag / postal packet (recordable).
Question 1
|
Year |
Count of Occurrence Number |
|
2020 |
21 |
|
2021 |
69 |
|
2022 |
69 |
|
2023 |
75 |
|
2024 |
40 |
|
2025 |
63 |
|
2026 |
81 |
|
Grand Total |
418 |
Question 2
|
Year |
Number of arrests |
|
2020 |
0 |
|
2021 |
0 |
|
2022 |
0 |
|
2023 |
0 |
|
2024 |
0 |
|
2025 |
4 |
|
2026 |
1 |
|
Grand Total |
5 |
Question 3, 4 and 5
All arrests were for ‘Theft of mail bag / postal packet’. In relation to arrests, 5 charges were made.
Question 6, 7
South Wales Police do not hold data on convictions. Under Section 16 - Duty to provide advice and assistance, you may wish to submit this part of your request to HM Courts & Tribunals Service) using the link provided below:
HM Courts & Tribunals Service - GOV.UK
Question 8
There were no other ‘out-of-court’ disposals. Please see ‘Outcome’ Table below.
Please note the outcome 00: Not recognised as an official outcome relates to crimes that have not yet been finalised and remain under investigation.
|
Outcome |
Count of Occurrence Number |
|
00: Not recognised as an official outcome |
3 |
|
01: Charged/summonsed |
3 |
|
01a: Charged/summonsed [alternate] |
1 |
|
14: Evidential difficulties [S not identified] |
14 |
|
15: Evidential difficulties [VS] |
15 |
|
16: Evidential difficulties [VDNS] |
26 |
|
18: Investigation complete [NSI] |
355 |
|
20: Further action by other agency [V Aware] |
1 |
|
Grand Total |
418 |
Please see below the meanings of the acronyms included in the outcome data:
SUA – Suspect under age
S ill – Suspect ill
VW dead/ill – Victim or witness dead/ill
S not identified – Suspect not identified
VS - Victim Supports
VDNS – Victim does not support
NSI – No suspect identified
V aware – Victim aware
CPS – Crown Prosecution Service
NIPI – Not in public interest
Please note, the number of those arrested and charged with ‘Theft of mail bag/ postal packet’ and the number of occurrences with the outcome of ‘charged’ is different. As the occurrence linked to the arrest might be recorded differently.
Question 9
|
Section |
|
CARDIFF BAY |
|
CATHAYS |
|
FAIRWATER |
|
CANTON |
|
RHONDDA |
Question 10
Already answered within question 1-9